12/12/2023 0 Comments Skyfonts google![]() This is even after they did a product testing and analysis with users. It had an overhaul to the SF UI, doing away with the sort / explorer window completely, even at huge protest from customers who had grown to rely on it. The single solitary reason I upgraded - so my auto-activation in CC 2018 keeps working. More than most font programs cost outright. Version 8 came about as CC 2018 was released. Version 7 had a great interface, complete with an 'explorer' view that allowed you to shuffle and sort fonts by a variety of methods. Not only is it ridiculous, it's greedy, it's sneaky, it's manipulative, and it's got me scouring for alternatives. and or every time adobe releases a new version. ![]() Having a reliable independent player that helps you being al little more independent from all the subscription models ist worth a lot! See MoreĪrin Ringwald's Experience Cash grabbing upgrades makes me cringe at the prospect of having to buy a new license for a new version EVERY. Last but not least, having been around in the industry for a long time, I (and everyone else) have experienced how bad it ist to have to rely on the 'big players' and their business decisions. And I've tried most of them or supported them on colleague's machines or my second ones. And while I know about one or the other shortcoming in my relationship with the program over the years (on both sides) I can tell you that no other tool comes close to it. Getting prepared for that situation without MainType would have cost me so much more time and grievances. (Just look at all the blunders Adobe, Apple and Microsoft have produced.) In January support for PS1 Fonts will end. Fonts seem to be so simple when everything works, but once you take a closer look the topic is extremely complex. Whenever I had a problem with it (mostly due to my own sloppiness when upgrading to a new computer) my support question was answered closer within minutes than hours. Sure, there is room for improvement - where isn't? - but what is worth so much more than one or the other "coolness" improvement is reliability and service. It might not look as "chiqué " as one or the other (mac) tool, but it works much better once you have got the hang of it. But as soon as you need it, it saves you. Locally installed fonts can conflict with web versions and lead to maddening discrepencies in testing.JoyousUtnapishtim's Experience I've been using MainType Professional for many years now, and I must admit that every now and then I was wondering if it is worth it, it's price - after all when everything works, you (or at least I) don't have to use it too often. Disable or remove any local copies of fonts when the mockup phase ends.Converted web fonts usually have messy names in menus.Some woff files didn’t work, in those rare cases the corresponding ttf worked fine–you might need to dig into the stylesheets to find the url.Converting fonts to a different container format makes them work correctly. Web TrueType fonts often won’t show in menus because their name-tables have been munged to discourage copying/theft.“ Good Artists Copy Great Artists Steal” wasn’t about shoplifting. Any file on the web can be copied, in fact every file viewed on the web already is a copy. Having those files makes converting fonts for comping easy, but it’s just as simple to download the files with a web browser. This means the font files can be downloaded and hosted on the web server alongside other assets like images or stylesheets. Standard-level accounts allow for self-hosted webfont projects. There are a number of tools for converting fonts, but the following web sites work well enough that I didn’t bother downloading an app. To use any web font for comping in desktop apps, just convert the ttf or woff file to otf, then use it like you would any normal font. ![]() Because of browser variation and font-face implementations, all three font containers are usually linked from a site’s stylesheets. Web fonts are normally provided in three file formats, two of which, TrueType *.TTF and Web Open Font Format *.WOFF, are easily converted back to standard TrueType or OpenType fonts. The thing is, with a little knowledge of how web fonts work, using those typefaces in desktop apps is quite easy. The few designers I know who’ve tried it found it restrictive and expensive. Monotype’s SkyFonts service is a nice idea, I guess, but their usage terms seem impractical and unrealistic. Convoluted, fragile workflows only create anxeity, they don’t foster creativity. Designers should be free to play and experiment with typefaces without worrying about running out of time or exceeding a monthly usage cap. There’s no way to anticipate the twists and turns a creative project will take. I wrote about problems downloading web fonts for desktop use when Google’s Web Fonts debuted, but years later it’s still an issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |